Changes of Media Legislation in Macedonia Are Guided by the Urgent Reform Priorities

Republic of Macedonia is undergoing a massive process of reforms which includes re-examining of the legal framework for freedom of expression, with a goal to make it more democratic, and speed up the process of accession to European Union.

In June 2015,  the European Commission published a list of urgent reform priorities to be fulfilled by Macedonia in the fields of rule of law and fundamental rights, de-politicisation of the public administration, freedom of expression and electoral reform. The new government, which came into power the end of May 2017 after a period of turmoil called “the political crisis,” had been promising to fulfill these reforms. This political will had been reflected within their work program and the Urgent Reform Priorities Plan “3-6-9,” outlining the measures to be taken during the first 3, then 6 and 9 months of their administration.

The four key urgent reform priorities area in the field of media and freedom of expression include:

  1. Reform of the Public Service Broadcaster in order to ensure its independence and increase the quality of its reporting and overall content production.
  2. Establishing mechanisms for transparency and accountability in regard to government advertising.
  3. Addressing the main obstacles which journalists face in obtaining access to public information.
  4. Revising the legislature and procedural rules related to defamation, and promotion of self-regulation and arbitration as alternative to court actions.

Within the first several months in office, the government initiated a process of wide consultations with civil society, media and other stakeholders, and took several immediate measures directly affecting the media environment. The general reforms suffered delays due to various political factors related to transition of power, and in particular because of the local elections that took place in October. After the elections the process picked up the pace, including more consultations related to amendments of particular laws.

37869423604_8412dd6728_o

Ms. Radmila Zhivanovic, Metamorphosis Board chairperson, Ms. Vesna Kartalevska, Regional Coordinator, Internet Freedom Project, ABA ROLI, Mr. Damjan Manchevski, Minister of Information Society and Administration of Republic of Macedonia, and Ms. Fani Karanfilova-Panovska, Executive Director of Open Society Foundation – Macedonia discussing the reforms in the are of freedom of expression and privacy at the e-Society.mk conference in Skopje, November 22, 2017. Photo by Vancho Dzhambaski, CC BY-NC-SA.

Alongside advocacy and participation in the consultations, civil society organizations also initiated monitoring of the reform processes. For instance, the Observatory of Media Reforms is directly addressing the fulfillment of the Urgent Reform Priorities through joint actions by a network of three civil society organizations: Metamorphosis, Agora and PINA, with support by the Open Society Foundation – Macedonia. The Observatory documents all actions related to media reforms through daily reporting, conducts investigative journalism and also issues periodical reports in order to educate the public about the state of play.

According to the first periodical report by the Observatory of Media Reforms, published in November during the 13th International Conference e-Society.mk in Skopje, the government has partially fulfilled its obligations. Within the particular four key areas, it noted that:

  • Public Broadcasting Service – the government started legislative reforms to establish financial stability , but these changes address only part of the needed reforms that would ensure professional, technological, programmatic and human resource development of the PBS.  The adopted measure (to abolish broadcasting fee paid by individual citizens and set aside a fixed percentage of the state budget for the PBS) would also result in severe limitations of the budget. The Observatory considered this priority “Initiated, but unfulfilled.”
  • Government advertising – the government declared that it will cease commercial advertising in the media and that it would continue to communicate with the public through the PBS and the social media. It didn’t provide explanations about several specific aspects within this area, for instance whether there would be paid advertisements on the PBS, would taxpayer-paid production of advertising clips continue, as well as about paid campaigns on social networks. The Observatory considered this priority “Partially Fulfilled.”
  • Access to Information – The government stated a process of “addressing the main obstacles which journalists face in obtaining public information” by declassifying a range of documents which had previously been classified within the state institutions. It also provided free access for journalists to public interest databases owned by two state institutions. The journalist community also demanded amending the Law for Free Access to Information of Public Character, in particular in regards to shortening the response deadlines. The Observatory considered this priority “Partially Fulfilled.”
  • Defamation – No revision of the legislature had been commenced, in particular of the Law for Civic Responsibility for Libel and Insult, as well as related procedural rules which need to be aligned with the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, and the recommendation of the Senior Experts’ Group on systemic Rule of Law issues lead by former European Commissioner R. Priebe. While it expressed strong political will to support the self-regulation mechanisms, the government had not adopted concrete measures to do so. The Observatory considered this priority “Completely Unfulfilled.”

The consultations continue during the last quarter of 2017, with the government putting several draft bills for public debate via its online platform ENER (Single National Electronic Register of Regulations), including the Law on Audio and Audiovisual Media Services, which is directly related to the PBS and the whole media scene.

The civil society organizations continue to participate and monitor the process, which would transfer to the parliament during the first months of 2018.

One comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s